This article examines the various enhancements made to the TCP/IP stack in Windows Vista and
how they provide improved reliability and performance over previous Windows platforms.
The Windows TCP/IP stack was significantly beefed up in Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP, and in service packs for these platforms, to include selective acknowledgements, TCP receive window scaling, dead gateway detection, and other tweaks that made it perform better and more reliably than Windows 2000’s stack performed. But under the hood, Windows Server 2003’s stack was still pretty much the same old stack developed in the early 90s for the Windows NT platform. In other words, it was a stack originally designed to support only IPv4. And when Microsoft in the mid 90s saw the growing need for their platform to support IPv6 as well as IPv4, support for IPv6 was simply tacked on by adding a second transport layer driver Tcpip6.sys to the existing Tcpip.sys driver for IPv4. This resulted in a "dual stack" where transport for IPv4 and IPv6 were handled by separate drivers, and to enable IPv6, support administrators had to install the IPv6 protocol component on their Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 machine TCP/IP Networking in Windows Vista
From around the Web
- Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Latest Release Schedule
- Vista SP2: What is inside?
- NetWitness releases free version of security software
- Three Reasons Why Users Won’t Buy Into Security
- Automated security testing & its limitations
- Google Wants to Preinstall Chrome Browser on PCs
- Mozilla warns of Firefox China add on
- Firefox No Longer an Automatic Defense Against Browser Drive Bys
- Google patches Chrome file stealing bug
- Apple plays catch up, adds anti fraud safeguard to Safari
- Researchers find vulnerability in Windows Vista
- How to Use Network Behavior Analysis Tools
- The insider security threat in IT and financial services
- Windows 7 security: An overall improvement?
- Windows 7 UAC could be less of a nag
0 comments for this entry ↓
There are no comments yet for this entry.
You must log in to post a comment.